“If Peresvet blinds an object, the new generation of laser weapons physically destroys the target. It burns,” Borisov said in an interview.
A senior Pentagon official told reporters during a news briefing on Wednesday that the United States had not seen any evidence to support Borisov’s claim.
In his nightly address to the nation, Zelensky ridiculed the idea of using Jadira and compared it to a “wonderwaf”. The term was coined during World War II by Nazi war propagandists who boasted of the lethality of modern military equipment, such as cruise missiles, although historians now say that these weapons were far less effective than advertising.
“All of this clearly indicates the complete failure of the attack,” Zelensky said Wednesday evening. “But again, it also shows that they are afraid to admit catastrophic mistakes at Russia’s highest state and military level.”
Putin claims that Russia is developing nuclear weapons capable of evading missile defense
Mick Ryan, a retired Australian Army Major General who is studying the Russian aggression, told the Washington Post that weapons such as Jadira could bring down recovery drones or Ukrainian artillery. It could also be used to blind Ukrainian troops, a tactic that is prohibited under international conventions, he added.
Ryan warned against taking Russia’s word for granted due to lack of evidence in support of Moscow’s claim. Since the war began, Russia has repeatedly tried to “intimidate the Ukrainians and the West with their so-called superiority,” Ryan said. “It simply came to our notice then. It is unlikely to work with an experimental laser system that is not yet proven to work. “
In the days leading up to his invasion of Ukraine, Putin escalated Western fears of a nuclear war by announcing a warning to his nuclear-armed forces. His foreign minister, Sergei Lavrov, backed the Bronx membership last month, saying Russia did not consider itself at war with NATO.
In March, US and British authorities confirmed that the Russian military had fired two hypersonic missiles, but London Reduce The significance of these weapons on the battlefield, arguing that their use was probably intended to distract from Russia’s stuttering ground operations.
“The reality is that there is no such thing as a silver bullet in war. It did not work for the Nazis and it will not work for the Russians, “said Ryan.
Peter Bezger contributed to this report.